HDR cliché

I realise that having time to play is something that is wasted on children!  Everyone should spend at least a few hours a week just playing with whatever they want to, it’s great for the blood pressure if nothing else.  Today’s focus was HDR.

I have a copy of Photomatix Pro, but have never really had time to get into it.  I have read the manual and even gone as far as buying and going through Practical HDR (David Nightingale).  However, the style never really grabbed me, I think that it’s the overdone stuff just puts me off.  The subtle stuff is pretty cool though, and I can see it helping to produce a balanced exposure when not possible with a single image, but retaining a sense of a realism.  As with all things though, when you don’t use something all the time, the knowledge that made sense on the first read-through just disappears so to me, Photomatix remains an application of mystery sliders with exciting names – I end up moving them through experimentation without any real understanding of what I am actually doing.

So today I was in the park as the girls were at a football training camp and I walked past an old mower.  Those over-processed HDR images of rusty old American cars in unusual and dramatic scenery sprang to mind, due to the aged and wonderfully textured paintwork I guess.  So I knelt down and grabbed three quick bracketed shots to see what it would turn out like as an HDR.

Here are the three original bracketed shots:

1/2000sec f/4 ISO100 50mm

1/500sec f/4 ISO100 50mm

1/125sec f/4 ISO100 50mm

I exported them straight into Photomatix from Lightroom without any tweaking, ensuring that I had selected Align Images (by correcting horizontal and vertical shifts) as I had shot handheld. I then just went through the various presets once it had merged them (due to my aforementioned lack of real knowledge), without getting distracted with the any manual, random sliding!  I must say that Fusion-Default gave the most realistic looking:

Fusion Default

…and I would certainly use this to produce a balanced image. It really brought up the shadows well, enhancing the details nicely. Compared to the correctly exposed, according to my D7000,  shot above (the middle one at 1/500sec), I think it’s a huge improvement.  However, without getting too HDR mad, I did quite like Enhancer-Painterly preset.  I processed it as this and took it back into Lightroom to tweak up the sharpness and lower the exposure of some light patches of grass with the Adjustment Brush to end up with this:

Enhancer-Painterly

It does look like a cliché HDR, but Dennis looks quite cool like this.  I am sure more time on reducing that slight ‘aura’ of brightness around it would help further, but I am just playing after all….

Back to the quicker, easier workflow I think.  I enjoyed the playing, but I can’t see myself using HDR that often, and if I do, I think Fusion-Default is the quick and easy path for the complete novice to achieving great results when the dynamic range is wider than desired.


My Favourite Lightroom B&W Presets

I adore B&W portraits, you see so much more of the person when you are not distracted by colours – I always think that they tell you about the subject with a better understanding.

I am sometimes asked about some of my processing choices for the portraits that I produce, and often publish on Blipfoto.  For the majority of the B&W ones, I use one from a set of tried and tested Lightroom presets as a starting point and tweak from there.  Which one I use depends mainly on the exposure of the shot, but also determined by the content (to a lesser extent). I never use them with their provided settings, each shot will certainly need to be adjusted further in some way – however, they give a great head-start that cuts down on average time spent per picture, especially when I know that what I want will be close to one of them, resulting in an improved workflow so I can spend more time shooting rather than tweaking.


So, for examples with this shot (this is the default RAW)…

You get these results.  I have included the names of the presets under each image and linked them to the template files (see link note below):

Natural

Deluxe

Deluxe Lighter

Childhood2

Focus

Focus (no vignetting)

Steller Utility

I do prefer Childhood2 and Focus for lighter shots, and used Childhood 2 as a starting point to end up with this final version:


For examples with this (again as default RAW), intentionally underexposed shot….

You get these results:

Natural
Deluxe
Deluxe Lighter
Childhood2
Focus
Focus (no vignetting)
Steller Utility

For this image, Steller Utility gave me the ideal starting point and I ended up with this final version:


I am not too keen on Split Toning at the moment and usually reduce (if not switch off) both settings, particularly highlights.  I also find some of the vignetting too strong in some shots, particularly the lighter ones and tend to reduce this considerably.  Apart from that, they are pretty much good to go – I hope if you do use them they work out for you as well as they have for me.  If you want to see more of my shots, check out my Blipfoto journal and the daily posts I make.

In case you don’t know how to import presets into Lightroom:

  1. Go into the Develop module (just press D!)
  2. Expand the Presets option on the left-hand pane
  3. Right-click anywhere on the existing folders and choose New Folder (or ignore this if you want to put them into an existing folder)
  4. Right-click that new folder (or the one you want to put them in) and choose Import.
  5. Locate the downloaded preset files and click on the Import button (you can import many templates at once to save time)

 


Link Note

I did not create any of these myself and am not intending to take credit for them in any way, but downloaded them from free sources a while back.  I am happy to link to any originals, but have put copies on here as I am not 100% exactly where I originally got them all that time ago.  Apologies for the advert-laden pages that these point to, but I cannot host all file types on this blog, and Mediafire is free :-|

Ignore the ads, click on the green Download button under the filename and enjoy.  (If you get any errors, redirects or pop-ups then let me know and I’ll sort out an alternative location.)


Wish You Were Here

We’ve had a cracking week in Cornwall, the girls loved each and every minute.  We really love where we live, but it is the most landlocked place in the country – so a trip to the seaside is a joy for them.

The weather was forecast to be pretty grey all week, but luckily they got it wrong and it was pretty hot and sunny (that doesn’t happen very often does it? :-) ).  Most of the time was spent on the beach, but we had the odd visit out too.  I had not been to St Ives before, and instantly loved it.  So much so we went twice… it reminded us of Whitby quite a lot, and proved to be terrific for photography.

My wind down time for the week was to take some time out to get some shots, and luckily I got the chance to try a few things for the first time, as well as my main love – portraits.  Not all of my experimenting went well – my long exposure shots all sucked, as did my night shots – but I did enjoy shooting fireworks for the first time and was pleased with the results.

I have stuck these up on Facebook, but wanted a more permanent copy here, as I have been tempted to zap my account for quite a few months now…… (continues to ponder).   There’s a few here I adore.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.


Harbour Jumpers

Whilst in St. Ives last week, we had an hour to kill until a table was ready in one of the seafront restaurants (The Onshore).  It was our third wedding anniversary, so we had treated ourselves to a very nice meal indeed – mighty fine it was too.  The steak was one of the best I have ever tasted!

Anyhoo….we walked to the end of one of the harbour walls trying to spot one of the local seals when we were treated to some fearless jumpers in wet suits launching themselves off into the water.  It gave me an ideal opportunity to try some fast shooting – I do portraits about 99% of the time, so this was a bit of a challenge for me.  Thanks to them, I got some vital practise and learnt a lot.  I just wish there were more vantage points to shoot from, it was quite limited.

Watching them was captivating.  I have never been a good swimmer and as such, have stayed away from being in the water for most of my life.  However, this looked so much fun and my inner-child was crying out for a go.  I would have probably had a horrendous injury though, so I’ll stick to being on this side of the camera.

Cheers guys :-D

This slideshow requires JavaScript.


Poor Man’s Macro

I always love the idea of being able to do macro photography…., no, what I think I mean is that I would love to be good at taking macro shots.  I know that those to things are very different and the latter takes infinite patience, tons of practise and quite a bit of cash!

A good friend of mine lent me the Nikkor 105mm F/2.8 last year and I had a little play, and soon realised that anything that edges towards those wonderful shots you see involves some serious lighting and a lot of time in Photoshop.  Even the lens itself is well out of my current budget, they are not the cheapest by any means.

When browsing some entries on Blip (the best site on the web) I saw a reference to some macro filters.  This was not something I had heard about before – yes, I need to read more – and did some searching around.  filtersI came across these on Amazon and thought they were too good to be true given the price.  Although I trust Amazon product reviews as far as I could throw a pregnant cow, they seemed quite positive and genuine.  What the hell – for £13 they could be ropey.

I got them for my 50mm f/1.4 – my favourite piece of kit – but they are also available in a range of diameters to suit the most popular lenses. From the initial test shots to some that I have taken a little more care over (examples being a bee and a pale daffodil), I have been immensely impressed.  Sure, they are no substitute for a proper macro lens, but I am happy enough with the quality for what I want to do as an enthusiastic amateur, so feel chuffed to bits with not shelling out hundreds of pounds for the real deal.

There are four filters that screw onto the lens, and they can also be stacked to suit intermediate focal distances.  I have included some shots here to give you an idea of their scope.

50mm lens shooting at minimal focal distance (no filters)

macrofilters-none

50mm lens with the 1x filter

macrofilters-1x

50mm lens with the 2x filter

I had real trouble with the clarity of this one, and I took a fair few shots to try and get round it, but I just couldn’t get a clear, focussed shot – I think I may have a dodgy x2 one :-\

macrofilters-2x

50mm lens with the 4x filter

macrofilters-4x

50mm lens with the 10x filter

macrofilters-10x

50mm lens with the 4x and 10x filters stacked

macrofilters-10x 4x

For publishing on the web they are pretty OK eh?

I did shoot these all at f/16 as the DoF reduces rapidly when they are used, and anything much less with the more powerful filters results in an incredibly unusable shot.

Here are some at 50% resolution crops of the same images to give you a further idea.  They didn’t look too hot at 100% I must admit, but as I am using them for publishing online then this is not a problem for me.  The 1x and 2x filters do not produce good results and are only good for doing small to medium sized images, especially the 2x one. However, I predominantly seem to be using the 4x and 10x, but I can see that this could annoy others.

macrofilters1x-50macrofilters2x-50macrofilters4x-50macrofilters10x-50macrofilters10x 4x-50

I am still a poor man, but I at least I have a poor man’s macro to keep me happy.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.